Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Remember Joe?

Last week, Frank Rich railed that by rejecting a liberal Republican in New York state, conservatives were "eating their own." Mr. Rich never showed much concern when his own party did exactly the same thing to liberal hawk Joseph Lieberman. (Remember my August 2007 blog "Hypocritical Kos," which was about a tasteless photo promulgated by Daily Kos showing the Senator's head at the level of President Bush's waist.) What is good politics for Democrats is barbarism for Republicans.

Sunday, October 04, 2009

It Starts With an "H"

There is a word liberals love to use whenever a Mark Sanford sex scandal or a Rush Limbaugh drug problem comes up. This word should also be applied to David Letterman, who for years has made fun of other people's sexual misdeeds (remember his two-priests-in-a-tree joke) or their possible sexual misdeeds (Sarah Palin's daughter might screw Alex Rodriguez), or even the way they dress (Sarah Palin dressing like "a slutty flight attendant"). Well, to Hell with all that nonsense, because Letterman himself is unable to control his sexuality. So I never want to hear another joke from David Letterman making fun of someone else's sex life. There's a word for this.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Apologies to the Geto Boys

Damn, it feels good to be Obama
A real radical-ass with skills
Although I was born in Hawaii
Ended up in Chicago making deals
George Soros is my homeboy
And my government's making wheels
I get all my props from NBC
Send contracts to GE
Givin' all support to abortion
Babies don't vote for D's
Is it all about the women?
It's only sex to me
I used to work for ACORN
And they really helped me win
Marxism was finished
'Till I pulled it outta the dustbin
Now all I gotta say to you
Radical Islamic pranksters
Israel gets attacked- - nothin's what I'm gonna do
Damn, it feels good to be Obama

Book Review

The book The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs. Disraeli by Richard Aldous is the story of how two brilliant men introduced Britain's modern two parties. The current Conservative Party arose from the Tory party, which included refugees from the old Whig party who disapproved of the armed ideology of the French Revolution. Thus, Disraeli's party was reformist and aristocratic at the same time. Meanwhile, the Whig party was transforming from the party skeptical of monarchical power into a party embracing the egalitarianism of the French Revolution. Gladstone's role came in the anti-protectionism and social change of today's Liberal party.

The two men were not emblamatic of their politics- - Disraeli was a liberal conservative who contracted venereal disease and married for money, while Gladstone was a conservative liberal obsessed with sexual guilt.

The Lion and the Unicorn is enjoyable to read, and Aldous gives us a perfect introduction for the neophyte, and a sense of their rivalry to those of us already familiar with the two titans of 19th century British politics.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Friends of Mr. Cairo

She came, as in the book, Mickey Spillane
That Saturday night dark masquerade
Had filled his friend with lead, the same, sweetheart
But then, as nothing happens quite the same
Investigation is the game
He had to check her story right away- he dead
Sam Spade his buddy first to go he got it
She spelt it out, how could they know the "Fatman" got it- he dead
Her sister didn't really live at all- confusion- he dead
His chase led to the Fatman, to face the friends of Mr. Cairo
That night the double crosser got it right
Pretending he was really dim
He slipped to Sam a double gin (Mickey Finn)
He woke, the boys had gone, but not his gun
They left a note to lead him on
The chase to find the Maltese Falcon- you bet
Early thirties gangster movies
Set to spellbound population
From Chicago to Hong Kong
Via Istanbul the Talking Tong
Dirty rats through prohibition
Money flowed through gangsterism
Acting out this fantasy
In Hollywood's vicinity
The best part for the best rendition
Al Capone he sent to prison
Citizen Kane came fast and quickly
Conquerin' ol' New York City
Poking fun at superstition
Media became television -give me Cagney anyday
Or Jimmy Stewart for President
Or Eddie "G" and all those guys
Who always shoot between the eyes, between the eyes, between the eyes
Father love do you work, do you work for mother
Chances could call, and accept that, be no other
Science as it might, disappear correspond with color
Chance is the fruit, will outlive, what is now the brother
Call for total wealth to distribute like a picture
In black and white, give it joy, give it, let it hit you
Spoil our existence by extreme gift to population
Father love do you work, do you work for Mother
Tell me straight be the Godfather be no other
Media Kings give us now give us total movie
Straight right now, give it clear, give us total movie
Now being here, being now, being here believing
One on one to talk to you
Like film stars they get close to you
You've mirrored his appeal
He wants you so, wants to be beside you
Then you pass by giving him the other side of you
Like the mystics do
So that every time he moves, he moves for you
Soul and light can always see the meeting of true love and she
The silent night and I,
I guess a lonely mind might see
I've seen love on the screen
I've seen a screen goddess and me- oh,
How often this, how often, this power of you
And so I must confess
Whatever I see
I'm meant to be there with you, with you, with you
Silent golden movies, talkies, technicolor, long ago
My younger ways stand clearer, clearer than my footprints
Stardom greats I've followed closely- closer than the nearest heartbeat
Longer than expected- there were great
Oh love, oh love, just to see them
Acting on the silver screen, oh my
Clark Gable, Fairbanks, Maureen O'Sullivan
Fantasy would fill my life and I love fantasy so much
Did you see in the morning light
I really talked, yes I did, to God's early dawning light
And I was privileged to be as I am today, to be with you, to be with you

Jon and Vangelis "Friends of Mr. Cairo"

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Consolidate, Regulate, Confiscate

There existed, at the turn of the century, two very different types of progressive thought. The thinking of Teddy Roosevelt was that the market should always involve a number of small interests competing with each other to produce at the lowest price possible. Hence, Roosevelt was known as a "trust-buster"; corporations like Standard Oil needed to be broken into smaller concerns.

A very different vision of businesses was held by Justice Louis Brandeis, who believed there was no such thing as a business that was too big. (Sound familiar?) Corporations should, in this view, be allowed to become enormous entities regulated closely by government. Ultimately, this view of business is totalitarian, because it takes no legal skill to nationalize behemoth corporations, making them part of the government.

The Obama administration follows the Brandeis model to a T- - consolidate, regulate, and confiscate.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Irving Kristol, RIP

Estase wishes to express his condolences to the family of Irving Kristol, perhaps one of the most brilliant men in America. Kristol was one of those people like Bill Buckley that Estase would have loved to have met in person, and is delighted to have known in print. God bless, Mr. Kristol.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

What Reform Movement?

In November 2006, Estase wrote a blog entitled "Samson Leftism" where he opined Democrats had no policy objectives, and was told with great pride by someone calling himself Causal that

"[Democrats will] Allow the government to negotiate directly with the pharmaceutical companies for lower drug prices for Medicare patients."

was one of Bela Pelosi's great ambitions. However as Oh Blah Blah's health plan has led him to buy off big pharmaceutical, Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post writes,

"Critics on Capitol Hill and online responded with outrage at the report that Obama had gone behind their backs and sold the reform movement short. Furthermore, the deal seemed to be a betrayal of several promises by then-Sen. Obama during the presidential campaign, among them that he would use the power of government to drive down the cost of drugs to Medicare, and that negotiations would be conducted in the open."

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Immoral Moralist

Yesterday Oh Blah Blah said we should have government-run health care because Ted Kennedy thought it was a moral issue. Pardon me for looking to someone other than a drunken, lecherous abortion-monger for moral guidance.

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Why Systematizers Are Wrong, Part Two

"Metaphysical hypotheses, in short, are not content to account for what may be by what is, nor to improve science according to the conditions of our nature, by raising probability on the foundations of certainty: but the makers of them affect to range in the immense void of possibility, with little or no regard to actuality; and begin very often, as well as end, in supposition(p360)."
Fourth Essay
Henry St. John (Viscount Bolingbroke)

Sunday, September 06, 2009

Liberals and Radicals

Liberals wish America was like Sweden.
Radicals wish America was like China.

Liberals like John Meynard Keynes.
Radicals like Karl Marx.

Liberals hate cigarette smoking.
Radicals hate people drinking milk.

Liberals like contraception.
Radicals like abortion.

Liberals fear the CIA.
Radicals fear the FBI.

Liberalism is like malignant carcinoma.
Radicalism is like liver cancer.

My New Favorite Lyrics

You're working so hard
And you're never in charge
Your death creates success
And you'll build and suppress

Change in the air
And they'll hide everywhere
And no one knows who is in control

Muse "Rule by Secrecy"

Friday, August 28, 2009

Rough TIme For Oh Blah Blah

I guess Daily Kos is not the place to go for political news. The Kosites seem surprised everyone is not in love with Obamacare, and opine that Obama just is not aggressive enough. Daily Kos makes The Nation look conservative.

Why Systematizers Are Wrong

"Thus we may concieve how men came to employ corporeal ideas, for the most part to explain the intellectual phaenomena, and sometimes to assist even their own reflections on them. The art was reasonably invented and usefully applied. But it soon became artifice, as soon as philosophers took into their heads to affect such science as they are incapable of attaining(p 131). Figures in general, these of speech, and all others that do not typify determinatly, are unworthy of rational creatures, how much more of God? and figures that typify nothing, are nothing, or they are worse than nothing; they are so many lies, since they pretend to denote something real, where nothing real exists (p138)."

Concerning the Nature, Extent, and Reality of Human
Knowledge
Henry St. John (Viscount Bolingbroke)

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Half a Whack-Job

Presidential advisor Cass Susstein must be half a whack-job, because he is friends with Peter Singer, the Princeton philosopher who advocates bestiality and infanticide. Incidently, Begala, anyone who belongs to the same party as Howard Dean and Jesse Jackson should know better than to bandy about accusations of mental illness.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

What is Judicial Review?

Treating Geraldo Rivera as if he were a legal intellectual may be silly, but more people see him on TV than read law books, so here goes. Geraldo said that one person's judicial activist is another's sound jurist. No, it is not.

A judicial activist is anyone who uses anything other than the laws themselves or historical assessments, including the Federalist Papers, to shed light on what the legislators meant in order to decide cases. An ancient principle is that judges tell the law, not make the law. This was made into a principle of judicial review by the Supreme Court finding in Luther v. Borden. Luther v. Borden said that political questions will not be decided by the courts, but by lawmakers or the people themselves. Things that judicial activists consider proper to consult include sociological studies, trendy philosophy, inventive false analogies, and even religious law. The last was consulted by a German judge regarding Islam and spousal abuse in 2007. Most people, even those who favor judicial activism, would never approve of this. But once you accept the principle that "good thinking" (Justice Ginsburg's phrase) is all that is needed to make law, why is that wrong?

Judicial activism is not necessarily liberal. If Justice Scalia argued a case based on Thomas Aquinas, that would be wrong for exactly the same reason that consulting Islamic law is wrong. At no period, past or present, was Thomas Aquinas elected or delegated to create any American law. Republican government is sick unto death once anyone other than an elected official creates a law. No one, other than a trained jurist, approved by such officials, should ever decide what a law means. Either Luther v. Borden was decided wrongly, or the Supreme Court has been exceeding its authority for decades. Sorry, Geraldo.

Monday, August 10, 2009

Freedom Trumps Democracy

Should America support democracy in all circumstances? Before you answer, keep in mind Edmund Burke's Conciliation WIth America , which states

"Man acts from adequate motives relative to his interest; and not on meta-
physical speculations. Aristotle, the great master of reasoning, cautions us, and
with great weight and propriety, against this species of delusive geometrical
accuracy in moral arguments, as the most fallacious of all sophistry."

In other words, politics cannot be an exercise in a priori reasoning where
"Two plus two equals four."
Advocating free elections in Turkey is based on this error. Because the election would result in Islamic theocrats taking over, it is foolish to watch tyrants take power by popular vote. In this case,
"Two plus two equals seven."

Thursday, August 06, 2009

The Dying Bird

During the French Revolution, Thomas Paine criticized Edmund Burke's response by saying that he mourned the plumage but not the dying bird. Estase is a 36 year old with a Master's degree who works at Wendy's. Estase never understood that quote until he was in the sun sweating. I am part of the bird- - the working public expected to support a government allied with big business. Oh Blah Blah is transforming America into Japan, where you have to know somebody in government to make money.

The problem with a system where a few people make a great living because of government is like the situation before the French Revolution. The only difference is that at least in feudalism, you knew whose serf you were. I know that I am the serf on some corrupt New York businessman's fief. When Bastille Day comes, in the words of Dale Earnhardt, "Payback's a bitch, son."

Open Letter to Senator Durbin

I beg you: do not vote for Waxman-Markey. Do not even think about it. As the weather gets hotter this year, I dread the summer of 2010 with Waxman-Markey. No air conditioning? Please tell me you are joking.
I was reading Coleridge's Rime of the Ancient Mariner, the part where the crew is chastised by death itself.

The naked hulk alongside came,
And the twain were casting dice;
"The game is done! I've won! I've won"
Quoth she, and whistles thrice.

How do you think Americans will feel when they cannot afford to stay cool? What civil disorders will arise? Do not win a victory that ultimately causes suffering and death.

Monday, August 03, 2009

Does Barack Obama Have A Concept of Freedom?

The fact that Oh Blah Blah's only coherent foreign policy theme is conciliation with Islam does not bode well for his domestic policy. After all, if America does not stand for personal freedom in Iran (where he thinks a fraudulent election is OK) or Turkey (where he is helping a mullahcracy take over) or Afghanistan (where he says he does not want victory) it does not look good for freedom in America either.

What happened with the abortive revolution in Iran is the foreign policy equivalent of what Bush did with Hurricane Katrina. Oh Blah Blah dropped the ball. He could not have helped the Iranians, but he could have mustered some of the outrage he expressed over the murder of abortionist George Tiller.

Do you really want economic policy created by a man who is comfortable with Islamic theocracy? What do you think? As always, comments are welcome.