From Sinai's Height

I always thought that pro-choice meant being free to choose whether or not to be involved with abortion. That abortion is not about choice is shown by events at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, where nurse Catherina Cenzon-DeCarlo, a Catholic nurse, was forced to participate in a non-emergency abortion on a 22-week pregnancy. The details can be found at www.hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/12/12/pro-life-nurse-forced-to-assist-an-abortion.

BEAR TO THE RIGHT

BEAR TO THE RIGHT
I have an idea-- announce a moratorium on building settlements in Judea and Samaria that commences when Iran abandons all its nuclear program. It would be really nice if our government were as tough on Iran as it is on Israel.

The Catholic Key Blog: Bishop John Wester Challenges Senate, Obama to Allow Undocumented Immigrants Health Coverage

The Catholic Key Blog: Bishop John Wester Challenges Senate, Obama to Allow Undocumented Immigrants Health Coverage
I wish Bishop Wester's ilk cared as much about abortion as they do about inflating our deficit to pay for illegals to get free health care.

Rinky Dink Reading Lists, Rated X

Anyone looking for a real gross-out that won't make you feel like eating for a few days should go to FirstThings.com. They have a very disturbing story about the recommended reading list that Kevin Jennings's organization created for children to read. It includes fun books about first grade boys having sex, wholesome stuff for kids to read. What kind of a psycho thinks that Kevin Jennings has any business being allowed near a school, let alone being made the man in charge of making them safe? How entangled with the promotion of homosexuality is President Obama?

Freedom of Speech

"A freedom of raillery, a liberty in decent language to question everything, and an allowance of unravelling or refuting any argument, without offense to the arguer, are the only terms which can render such speculative conversations in any way agreeable(p 49)."

A.A. Cooper (Lord Shaftesbury)
Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times

An Observation

The difference between a statesman and a politician is the difference between Susan Boyle and Britney Spears. The statesman looks unimpressive and performs well, and the politician is slick and, well, does not perform well. See also Plato's Gorgias, where the philosopher is compared to the physician and the rhetor is compared to the chef.

The Confused and Scuffling Bustle of Local Agency, Part Two

The trillion dollar stimulus was sold to us as a necessary job-saving measure. Now the government website Recovery.gov is claiming jobs were saved in congressional districts that do not even exist. This is not a mistake on the part of the government, it is a deliberate effort to decieve the American people into believing that this series of pork programs have done something they have not and will not do--save or create jobs.

Why Systematizers Are Wrong, Part Three

"In short, my lord, all these systems are so many enchanted castles, they appear to be something, they are nothing but appearances: like them too, dissolve the charm, and they vanish from the sight(p9). The philosopher begins with reason and ends with imagination. The historian inverts this order: he begins without memorials and he sometimes ends with them (p70)."
Henry St. John (Viscount Bolingbroke)
Study and Use of History

Remember Joe?

Last week, Frank Rich railed that by rejecting a liberal Republican in New York state, conservatives were "eating their own." Mr. Rich never showed much concern when his own party did exactly the same thing to liberal hawk Joseph Lieberman. (Remember my August 2007 blog "Hypocritical Kos," which was about a tasteless photo promulgated by Daily Kos showing the Senator's head at the level of President Bush's waist.) What is good politics for Democrats is barbarism for Republicans.

It Starts With an "H"

There is a word liberals love to use whenever a Mark Sanford sex scandal or a Rush Limbaugh drug problem comes up. This word should also be applied to David Letterman, who for years has made fun of other people's sexual misdeeds (remember his two-priests-in-a-tree joke) or their possible sexual misdeeds (Sarah Palin's daughter might screw Alex Rodriguez), or even the way they dress (Sarah Palin dressing like "a slutty flight attendant"). Well, to Hell with all that nonsense, because Letterman himself is unable to control his sexuality. So I never want to hear another joke from David Letterman making fun of someone else's sex life. There's a word for this.

Apologies to the Geto Boys

Damn, it feels good to be Obama
A real radical-ass with skills
Although I was born in Hawaii
Ended up in Chicago making deals
George Soros is my homeboy
And my government's making wheels
I get all my props from NBC
Send contracts to GE
Givin' all support to abortion
Babies don't vote for D's
Is it all about the women?
It's only sex to me
I used to work for ACORN
And they really helped me win
Marxism was finished
'Till I pulled it outta the dustbin
Now all I gotta say to you
Radical Islamic pranksters
Israel gets attacked- - nothin's what I'm gonna do
Damn, it feels good to be Obama

Book Review

The book The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone vs. Disraeli by Richard Aldous is the story of how two brilliant men introduced Britain's modern two parties. The current Conservative Party arose from the Tory party, which included refugees from the old Whig party who disapproved of the armed ideology of the French Revolution. Thus, Disraeli's party was reformist and aristocratic at the same time. Meanwhile, the Whig party was transforming from the party skeptical of monarchical power into a party embracing the egalitarianism of the French Revolution. Gladstone's role came in the anti-protectionism and social change of today's Liberal party.

The two men were not emblamatic of their politics- - Disraeli was a liberal conservative who contracted venereal disease and married for money, while Gladstone was a conservative liberal obsessed with sexual guilt.

The Lion and the Unicorn is enjoyable to read, and Aldous gives us a perfect introduction for the neophyte, and a sense of their rivalry to those of us already familiar with the two titans of 19th century British politics.

Friends of Mr. Cairo

She came, as in the book, Mickey Spillane
That Saturday night dark masquerade
Had filled his friend with lead, the same, sweetheart
But then, as nothing happens quite the same
Investigation is the game
He had to check her story right away- he dead
Sam Spade his buddy first to go he got it
She spelt it out, how could they know the "Fatman" got it- he dead
Her sister didn't really live at all- confusion- he dead
His chase led to the Fatman, to face the friends of Mr. Cairo
That night the double crosser got it right
Pretending he was really dim
He slipped to Sam a double gin (Mickey Finn)
He woke, the boys had gone, but not his gun
They left a note to lead him on
The chase to find the Maltese Falcon- you bet
Early thirties gangster movies
Set to spellbound population
From Chicago to Hong Kong
Via Istanbul the Talking Tong
Dirty rats through prohibition
Money flowed through gangsterism
Acting out this fantasy
In Hollywood's vicinity
The best part for the best rendition
Al Capone he sent to prison
Citizen Kane came fast and quickly
Conquerin' ol' New York City
Poking fun at superstition
Media became television -give me Cagney anyday
Or Jimmy Stewart for President
Or Eddie "G" and all those guys
Who always shoot between the eyes, between the eyes, between the eyes
Father love do you work, do you work for mother
Chances could call, and accept that, be no other
Science as it might, disappear correspond with color
Chance is the fruit, will outlive, what is now the brother
Call for total wealth to distribute like a picture
In black and white, give it joy, give it, let it hit you
Spoil our existence by extreme gift to population
Father love do you work, do you work for Mother
Tell me straight be the Godfather be no other
Media Kings give us now give us total movie
Straight right now, give it clear, give us total movie
Now being here, being now, being here believing
One on one to talk to you
Like film stars they get close to you
You've mirrored his appeal
He wants you so, wants to be beside you
Then you pass by giving him the other side of you
Like the mystics do
So that every time he moves, he moves for you
Soul and light can always see the meeting of true love and she
The silent night and I,
I guess a lonely mind might see
I've seen love on the screen
I've seen a screen goddess and me- oh,
How often this, how often, this power of you
And so I must confess
Whatever I see
I'm meant to be there with you, with you, with you
Silent golden movies, talkies, technicolor, long ago
My younger ways stand clearer, clearer than my footprints
Stardom greats I've followed closely- closer than the nearest heartbeat
Longer than expected- there were great
Oh love, oh love, just to see them
Acting on the silver screen, oh my
Clark Gable, Fairbanks, Maureen O'Sullivan
Fantasy would fill my life and I love fantasy so much
Did you see in the morning light
I really talked, yes I did, to God's early dawning light
And I was privileged to be as I am today, to be with you, to be with you

Jon and Vangelis "Friends of Mr. Cairo"

Consolidate, Regulate, Confiscate

There existed, at the turn of the century, two very different types of progressive thought. The thinking of Teddy Roosevelt was that the market should always involve a number of small interests competing with each other to produce at the lowest price possible. Hence, Roosevelt was known as a "trust-buster"; corporations like Standard Oil needed to be broken into smaller concerns.

A very different vision of businesses was held by Justice Louis Brandeis, who believed there was no such thing as a business that was too big. (Sound familiar?) Corporations should, in this view, be allowed to become enormous entities regulated closely by government. Ultimately, this view of business is totalitarian, because it takes no legal skill to nationalize behemoth corporations, making them part of the government.

The Obama administration follows the Brandeis model to a T- - consolidate, regulate, and confiscate.

Irving Kristol, RIP

Estase wishes to express his condolences to the family of Irving Kristol, perhaps one of the most brilliant men in America. Kristol was one of those people like Bill Buckley that Estase would have loved to have met in person, and is delighted to have known in print. God bless, Mr. Kristol.

What Reform Movement?

In November 2006, Estase wrote a blog entitled "Samson Leftism" where he opined Democrats had no policy objectives, and was told with great pride by someone calling himself Causal that

"[Democrats will] Allow the government to negotiate directly with the pharmaceutical companies for lower drug prices for Medicare patients."

was one of Bela Pelosi's great ambitions. However as Oh Blah Blah's health plan has led him to buy off big pharmaceutical, Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post writes,

"Critics on Capitol Hill and online responded with outrage at the report that Obama had gone behind their backs and sold the reform movement short. Furthermore, the deal seemed to be a betrayal of several promises by then-Sen. Obama during the presidential campaign, among them that he would use the power of government to drive down the cost of drugs to Medicare, and that negotiations would be conducted in the open."

Immoral Moralist

Yesterday Oh Blah Blah said we should have government-run health care because Ted Kennedy thought it was a moral issue. Pardon me for looking to someone other than a drunken, lecherous abortion-monger for moral guidance.

Why Systematizers Are Wrong, Part Two

"Metaphysical hypotheses, in short, are not content to account for what may be by what is, nor to improve science according to the conditions of our nature, by raising probability on the foundations of certainty: but the makers of them affect to range in the immense void of possibility, with little or no regard to actuality; and begin very often, as well as end, in supposition(p360)."
Fourth Essay
Henry St. John (Viscount Bolingbroke)

Liberals and Radicals

Liberals wish America was like Sweden.
Radicals wish America was like China.

Liberals like John Meynard Keynes.
Radicals like Karl Marx.

Liberals hate cigarette smoking.
Radicals hate people drinking milk.

Liberals like contraception.
Radicals like abortion.

Liberals fear the CIA.
Radicals fear the FBI.

Liberalism is like malignant carcinoma.
Radicalism is like liver cancer.

My New Favorite Lyrics

You're working so hard
And you're never in charge
Your death creates success
And you'll build and suppress

Change in the air
And they'll hide everywhere
And no one knows who is in control

Muse "Rule by Secrecy"

Rough TIme For Oh Blah Blah

I guess Daily Kos is not the place to go for political news. The Kosites seem surprised everyone is not in love with Obamacare, and opine that Obama just is not aggressive enough. Daily Kos makes The Nation look conservative.

Why Systematizers Are Wrong

"Thus we may concieve how men came to employ corporeal ideas, for the most part to explain the intellectual phaenomena, and sometimes to assist even their own reflections on them. The art was reasonably invented and usefully applied. But it soon became artifice, as soon as philosophers took into their heads to affect such science as they are incapable of attaining(p 131). Figures in general, these of speech, and all others that do not typify determinatly, are unworthy of rational creatures, how much more of God? and figures that typify nothing, are nothing, or they are worse than nothing; they are so many lies, since they pretend to denote something real, where nothing real exists (p138)."

Concerning the Nature, Extent, and Reality of Human
Knowledge
Henry St. John (Viscount Bolingbroke)

Half a Whack-Job

Presidential advisor Cass Susstein must be half a whack-job, because he is friends with Peter Singer, the Princeton philosopher who advocates bestiality and infanticide. Incidently, Begala, anyone who belongs to the same party as Howard Dean and Jesse Jackson should know better than to bandy about accusations of mental illness.

What is Judicial Review?

Treating Geraldo Rivera as if he were a legal intellectual may be silly, but more people see him on TV than read law books, so here goes. Geraldo said that one person's judicial activist is another's sound jurist. No, it is not.

A judicial activist is anyone who uses anything other than the laws themselves or historical assessments, including the Federalist Papers, to shed light on what the legislators meant in order to decide cases. An ancient principle is that judges tell the law, not make the law. This was made into a principle of judicial review by the Supreme Court finding in Luther v. Borden. Luther v. Borden said that political questions will not be decided by the courts, but by lawmakers or the people themselves. Things that judicial activists consider proper to consult include sociological studies, trendy philosophy, inventive false analogies, and even religious law. The last was consulted by a German judge regarding Islam and spousal abuse in 2007. Most people, even those who favor judicial activism, would never approve of this. But once you accept the principle that "good thinking" (Justice Ginsburg's phrase) is all that is needed to make law, why is that wrong?

Judicial activism is not necessarily liberal. If Justice Scalia argued a case based on Thomas Aquinas, that would be wrong for exactly the same reason that consulting Islamic law is wrong. At no period, past or present, was Thomas Aquinas elected or delegated to create any American law. Republican government is sick unto death once anyone other than an elected official creates a law. No one, other than a trained jurist, approved by such officials, should ever decide what a law means. Either Luther v. Borden was decided wrongly, or the Supreme Court has been exceeding its authority for decades. Sorry, Geraldo.

Freedom Trumps Democracy

Should America support democracy in all circumstances? Before you answer, keep in mind Edmund Burke's Conciliation WIth America , which states

"Man acts from adequate motives relative to his interest; and not on meta-
physical speculations. Aristotle, the great master of reasoning, cautions us, and
with great weight and propriety, against this species of delusive geometrical
accuracy in moral arguments, as the most fallacious of all sophistry."

In other words, politics cannot be an exercise in a priori reasoning where
"Two plus two equals four."
Advocating free elections in Turkey is based on this error. Because the election would result in Islamic theocrats taking over, it is foolish to watch tyrants take power by popular vote. In this case,
"Two plus two equals seven."

The Dying Bird

During the French Revolution, Thomas Paine criticized Edmund Burke's response by saying that he mourned the plumage but not the dying bird. Estase is a 36 year old with a Master's degree who works at Wendy's. Estase never understood that quote until he was in the sun sweating. I am part of the bird- - the working public expected to support a government allied with big business. Oh Blah Blah is transforming America into Japan, where you have to know somebody in government to make money.

The problem with a system where a few people make a great living because of government is like the situation before the French Revolution. The only difference is that at least in feudalism, you knew whose serf you were. I know that I am the serf on some corrupt New York businessman's fief. When Bastille Day comes, in the words of Dale Earnhardt, "Payback's a bitch, son."

Open Letter to Senator Durbin

I beg you: do not vote for Waxman-Markey. Do not even think about it. As the weather gets hotter this year, I dread the summer of 2010 with Waxman-Markey. No air conditioning? Please tell me you are joking.
I was reading Coleridge's Rime of the Ancient Mariner, the part where the crew is chastised by death itself.

The naked hulk alongside came,
And the twain were casting dice;
"The game is done! I've won! I've won"
Quoth she, and whistles thrice.

How do you think Americans will feel when they cannot afford to stay cool? What civil disorders will arise? Do not win a victory that ultimately causes suffering and death.

Does Barack Obama Have A Concept of Freedom?

The fact that Oh Blah Blah's only coherent foreign policy theme is conciliation with Islam does not bode well for his domestic policy. After all, if America does not stand for personal freedom in Iran (where he thinks a fraudulent election is OK) or Turkey (where he is helping a mullahcracy take over) or Afghanistan (where he says he does not want victory) it does not look good for freedom in America either.

What happened with the abortive revolution in Iran is the foreign policy equivalent of what Bush did with Hurricane Katrina. Oh Blah Blah dropped the ball. He could not have helped the Iranians, but he could have mustered some of the outrage he expressed over the murder of abortionist George Tiller.

Do you really want economic policy created by a man who is comfortable with Islamic theocracy? What do you think? As always, comments are welcome.

Those Pesky Rules!

"All the ancient, honest juridical principles and institutions of England are so many clogs to check and retard the headlong course of violence and oppression."

Edmund Burke
Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol

This Should Go Without Saying

As we await the elevation of Tyne Daly to the Supreme Court, Estase would like to discuss the "legal" philosophy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. No, it isn't enough merely to make up American laws from the bench, but Ginsburg believes we now need to let legislatures in other countries vote on American laws. In an address to the American Society of International Law, Ginsburg said we, "should not . . . abandon the effort to learn what we can from the experience and good thinking foreign sources may convey." This is not a philosophical debating society we are talking about. This is the law of the United States, and looking for clever sophisms to replace our laws strikes at our republican democracy. How about speech laws from Red China, or family law from Iran? Why have a U.S. Congress if the Supreme Court is going to force us to live under other nations' laws anyway? The main reason against this is the reason we fought England to form our country- - the founding fathers did not want us to live under laws we had no voice in creating. So unless we get to vote for politicians in Sweden, Swedish laws should have no bearing on our laws.

China Confidential: Turkey's 'Trial of the Century' Begins

China Confidential: Turkey's 'Trial of the Century' Begins
Is it really surprising that the pro-Islam Hawaii Forty-Four is on the side of the would-be mullahcrats?

Limits of Judicial Review

"Nor should it ever be lost sight of, that the government of the United States is one of limited and enumberated powers; and that a departure from the true import and sense of its powers is, pro tanto, the establishment of a new constitution. It is doing for the people, what they have not chosen to do for themselves. (p. 144) Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness, or juridical research. (p157) To resign an exposition so sanctioned, would be to deliver over the country to interminable doubts; and to make the constitution, not a written system of government, but a false and delusive text, upon which every successive age of speculatists and statesmen might build any system, suited to their own views and opinions. (p 378)."

Justice Joseph Story
Commentaries on the Constitution

Vested Interests

The bailouts at Chrysler and General Motors remind me of the classic vested interests case, the Charles Bridge Case. In the early 1800's, a group of investors chose to build a toll bridge to replace a ferry in Boston. The local government then made this investment useless by building a free bridge over the same river. The employees and stockholders in Ford Motors are about to be screwed in the exact same way. Their investment is about to be damaged or lost due to Oh Blah Blah's choice to subsidize the production of "eco-friendly" cars. These cars will compete with Ford products, and Chrysler and General Motors will be relieved of the pressure to do what all companies in a capitalist system are expected to do- - make a profit.

The Spirit of 89

Where does the wording and concepts of the American Constitution come from? Some of it comes nearly verbatim from the Britisn Declaration of Rights.
British By raising and keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace without the consent of Parliament and quartering soldiers contrary to the law.
American No Soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house, without consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

British By causing several good subjects, being Protestant, to be disarmed at the same time when Papists were both armed and employed contrary to the law. That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.
American A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

British That it is the right of the subjects to petition the King, and all commitments and prosecutions for petitioning are illegal. And that for redress of grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws parliaments ought to be frequently held.
American Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

British That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.
American They [Congressmen and Senators] shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

British That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
American Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The International Community Did Not Make Us

The right of the Iranian People to not be beaten or murdered does not come from "consensus" or "norms."

President Algernon SIdney

President Obama needs to stop using pedantic language about the Iranian tyrants violating "international norms," and instead admit that they

China Confidential: Abandoned by America, Iranians are Massacred

China Confidential: Abandoned by America, Iranians are Massacred

Forcing Morals Upon Others

The Christian Congressman took the floor of the House amid boos and objections. The opposition called him a fanatic and said he was trying to force his religion on others. Any one who wanted to debate this right would be stopped by a coalition of those who supported it. The Congressman tried to oppose the right, and claimed it was unconstitutional to suppress debate in this way. The oppostion claimed their right was part of the Constitution. This did actually happen. The date was May 26, 1836. The Congressman was John Quincy Adams. And the right was slavery.

The Strange Death of Humor

The disgusting sexual assault by Sasha Baron Cohen against Eminem at the MTV Movie Awards points out something about American comedy. It isn't funny. The trend started with degenerates like Lenny Bruce and George Carlin, neither of whom could say anything without filthy language and gross references to sex. Movies such as American Pie included jokes about sick things like the ingestion of semen. It has moved past comedy now- - when Rachel Maddow referred to the Tea Parties she referred to them with an oral sex reference. Is it possible for anyone to get a laugh with the kind of word play humor Groucho Marx specialized in? Does anyone wish to treat any subject with taste anymore?

Involuntary Association, Part Three

"In some cases the subordinate relations are voluntary, in others they are necessary, but the duties are all compulsive. When we marry, the choice is voluntary, but the duties are not a matter of choice; they are dictated by the nature of the situation. Dark and unscrutable are the ways by which we come into the world."
Edmund Burke, "An Appeal From the New to
the Old Whigs"

Making College Count, Part Two

"The whole trouble is that the American system from beginning to end is gauged to the run-of-mine American rather than to the picked American. The run-of-mine Frenchman does not get any nearer the University than the adjacent woodpile. He does not get into the equivalent of our undergraduate college. If he gets through the French equivalent of our secondary school, he does so by what our ancestors called the uncovenanted mercies of Providence, and every step of his progress is larded with bitter sweat. The chief reason why my Italian friend found no educated American under sixty years of age is that forty years ago the run-of-mine American did not, as a rule, get much nearer the founts of the higher learning than the run-of-mine Frenchman does to-day, and for the same reason- - he could not, speaking strictly, "make the grade." The newspapers some time ago quoted the president of Colombia as saying that durin the past half-century the changes in school and college instruction, as to both form and content, have been so complete that it is probably safe to say that to-day no student in Columbia College, and perhaps no professor on its faculty, could pass satisfactorily the examination-tests that were set for admission to Columbia College fifty years ago."
Albert J. Nock, 1937

Appeasement Does Not Work

The foreign policy of Oh Blah Blah seems to be based on the idea that if we can just give enough money and sympathy to our enemies, particularly those who attacked us in 2001, they will decide that we are nice people and stop killing Americans. This is the logic behind nonsense like using American money to rebuild what Israel destroyed in its war in Gaza.

Unfortunately, the Catholic Church in America seems to believe the same sort of thing. If the bishops can flatter secondary liberals by endorsing their socialist vision as a "consistant life ethic" or a "seamless garment", they will stop doing the things the Church disapproves of. The most recent example of this is Notre Dame honoring Hawaii Forty-Four despite the fact that he is not only pro-choice, but has also declared war on the Catholic hospital system. Obama and his allies will not reconsider their policies simply because America's premier Catholic university did something nice for him.

Lockean Liberalism vs. The Political Commercial Complex

As shown in the Declaration of Rights, the idea that we are the masters of our own fate led to the belief that citizens have the right to arms for the defense of their own lives. Not only do advocates of entangling politics and commerce not support the Second Amendment, they now apparently believe that patriotism means sacrificing not for Mother, Country, and God, but for Chrysler. Obama solomnly declares private businessmen should accept 39 cents on the dollar because "we all have to make sacrifices." Funny, I do not see the UAW making sacrifices- - they are making out like bandits. The Oh Blah Blah way is making everyone but his political supporters suffer.

Is it any wonder that our masters will not trust us with guns when they assume the private investor should suffer for the good of Chrysler and the UAW?

The Declaration of Rights, 1689

Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil councillors, judges, and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of the kingdom.
1By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws, and the execution of laws, without the consent of parliament.
2By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates for humbly petitioning to be excused concurring to the said assumed power.
3By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the Great Seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes.
4By levying money for and to the use of the crown by pretence of prerogative, for other time and in other manner than the same was granted to parliament.
5BY RAISING AND KEEPING A STANDING ARMY WITHIN THIS KINGDOM IN TIME OF PEACE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF PARLIAMENT AND QUARTERING SOLDIERS CONTRARY TO THE LAW.
6BY CAUSING SEVERAL GOOD SUBJECTS, BEING PROTESTANTS, TO BE DISARMED AT THE SAME TIME WHEN PAPISTS WERE BOTH ARMED AND EMPLOYED CONTRARY TO THE LAW.
7By violating the freedom of election by members to serve in parliament.
8By prosecutions in the Court of King's Bench for matters and causes cognizable only in parlia-ment ; and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses.
9And whereas of late years, partial, corrupt, and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials, and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason, which were not freeholders.
10Excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases, to elude the benefit of laws made for the liberty of the subjects.
11And excessive fines have been imposed; and illegal and cruel punishments inflicted.
12And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures, before any conviction or judgment against the persons, upon whom the same were to be levied.

All which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this realm. And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government, and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highness the Prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the lords spiritual and temporal, and divers principal persons of the Commons) cause letters to be written to the lords spiritual and temporal, being Protestants; and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs, and Cinque Ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them, as were of right to be sent to parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon January 22, 1689. . .

And thereupon the said lords spiritual and temporal and Commons. . . do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties, declare: 1That the pretended power of suspending of laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament, is illegal.
2That the pretended power of dispensing with laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal.
3That the commission for erecting the late Courts os Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes and courts of the like nature are illegal and pernicious.
4That levying money for or to the use of the Crown, by pretence of prerogative, without grant of parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is, or shall be granted, is illegal.
5THAT IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE SUBJECTS TO PETITION THE KING, AND ALL COMMITMENTS AND PROSECUTIONS FOR SUCH PETITIONING ARE ILLEGAL.
6That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with the consent of parliament, is against law.
7THAT THE SUBJECTS WHICH ARE PROTESTANTS MAY HAVE ARMS FOR THEIR DEFENCE SUITABLE TO THEIR CONDITIONS AND AS ALLOWED BY LAW.
8That election of members of parliament ought to be free.
9THAT THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND DEBATES OR PROCEEDINGS IN PARLIAMENT OUGHT NOT TO BE IMPEACHED OR QUESTIONED IN ANY COURT OR PLACE OUT OF PARLIAMENT.
10THAT EXCESSIVE BAIL OUGHT NOT TO BE REQUIRED, NOR EXCESSIVE FINES IMPOSED; NOR CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS INFLICTED.
11That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders.
12That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.
13AND THAT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, AND FOR THE AMENDING, STRENGTHENING AND PRESERVING OF THE LAWS, PARLIAMENTS OUGHT TO BE FREQUENTLY HELD.

And they do claim, demand, and insist upon all and singular the premisses, as their undoubted rights and liberties; and that no declaration, judgments, doings or proceedings, to the predjudice of the people in any of the said premises, ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter into consequence of example. To which demands of their rights they are particularly encouraged by the declaration of His Highness the Prince of Orange, as being the only means for obtaining a full redress and remedy therein. Having therefore an entire confidence that his said Highness the Prince of Orange will perfect the deliverance so far advanced by him, and will still preserve them from the violation of their rights, which they have here asserted, and from all other attempts upon their religion, rights, and liberties. The said Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, assembled at Westminster do resolve that William and Mary, Prince and Princess of Orange be, and be declared, King and Queen of England, France, and Ireland, and the dominions thereunto belonging, to hold the Crown and royal dignity of the said kingdoms and dominions to them the said Prince and Princess during their lives, and the life of the survivor of them; and that the sole and full exercise of regal power be only in, and executed by the said Prince of Orange, in the names of the said Prince and Princess, during their joint lives; and after their deceases, the said Crown and royal dignity of the said Kingdoms and dominions to be to the heirs of the body of the said Princess; and for default of such issue to the Princess Anne of Denmark and the heirs of her body; and for default of such issue to the heirs of the body of the said Prince of Orange. And the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the commons do pray the said Prince and Princess to accept the same accordingly.

Kristol Clear

"The enemy of liberal capitalism today is not so much socialism as nihilism. Only liberal capitalism doesn't see nihilism as an enemy, but rather as just another splendid business opportunity."

"The New Left, though it echoes this proposition when it is convenient for its purposes, is actually dedicated to the counterbelief- - which is the preliberal proposition- - that to be good is to be free. In the war between these two heresies, the idea of a free society that is in some specific sense virtuous (the older bourgeois ideal) and the ideal of a good community that is in some specific sense free (the older "socialist" ideal as represented, say, by European social democracy) are both emasculated; and the very possibility of a society that can be simeotaneously virtuous and free, i.e. that organically weds order to liberty, becomes ever more remote."

"The danger is rather that the large corporation will be thoroughly integrated into the public sector, and lose its private character altogether. The transformation of American capitalism that this would represent - - a radical departure from the quasi-bourgeois "mixed economy"to a system that could be fairly described as kind of "state capitalism"- - does constitute a huge potential threat to the individual liberties Americans have traditionally enjoyed."

All of the above are from Irving Kristol, and all are prophetic of what Obama is doing to America.

Unlaw

Here's another quote, this one being by a Dr. Freeman in the Fortnightly Review of September of 1871.

"We have reached the state which our fathers called Unlaw, not the state where law is silent, but the state where law is turned about and become its own opposite, the state when the institutions which were meant to declare right, and truth, and freedom, had been turned into engines of wrong, and falsehood, and bondage."

Three Political Experts

Sometimes a person's following has nothing to do with how much sense they make. Mao Zedong was not only a psychotically anti-American communist, his theory that the will to be wealthy and productive was all that China needed to be wealthy and productive lead to famine and decades of poverty. His thoughts would be of only historical interest if it weren't for the fact that many on the left still hold them. One wonders if Oh Blah Blah hasn't adopted these thoughts, since his Norman Vincent Peale economics seems to be that you can spend four trillion dollars and have economic growth by mouthing the words "fiscal responsibility."

Jesse Jackson said at the 1992 Democratic Convention that the Virgin Mary should have had an abortion. This would just be an odd religious belief if so many didn't see Jackson as a "black leader."

Ann Coulter confronts the insanity of Muslims claiming everyone should be Muslim by the insanity that everyone should be Christian. People still invite this Hillary Clinton fan to speak about what she thinks conservatism means.

The Confused and Scuffling Bustle of Local Agency

Barry Obama (aka Hawaii Forty-Four) holding a conference on fiscal responsibility is like Michael Phelps and A-Rod going on a high school speaking tour to keep people off drugs.

The trillion dollar "stimulus" plan is a bizarre economic expiriment that will either cause a recovery or massive inflation. It's kind of like the detonation of the first atom bomb at Alamagordo, New Mexico in 1944. Physicists weren't sure the bomb would not destroy the whole earth. Something would have to be pretty dire to justify this kind of gamble. Estase would like to know who will benefit from the high speed rail between LA and Vegas. Not all spending is investment.

"Sir, the very man, of all others, who has the deepest interest in a sound currency, and who suffers most by mischievous legislation in money matters, is the man who earns his daily bread by his daily toil." - Daniel Webster

Good Job, People

The first actions of Oh Blah Blah seem to be aimed at furthering the pro-abortion agenda by forcing pro-life people to pay for abortions overseas. What's more, Oh Blah Blah supports the atrocious Freedom of Choice Act, which would foist abortion on Americans on a whole new scale. Reports also say that Obama wishes to force all doctors to perform abortions.

This is a message to all you Catholics who supported this man. The change you voted for has come. It is a change from moderately pro-life laws to ones that threaten life from conception to some unknown point after birth. (See my previous blog "When Does Life Begin?".) Why didn't you find out about this man before you struck a blow against the right of doctors not to perform abortions? Why didn't you care that he had a 100% rating from NARAL? How will you feel when the Church is forced to leave the field of healthcare in the same way that conscience has forced it to leave the adoption field? I hope you are all happy, because I'm not.

Peace for Israel vs. Pieces of Israel

Isn't it amazing how people can apologize for Hamas rocket attacks, and turn around and accuse the recipients of these rockets of "terrorism" ? Also, note the Palestinian praise for the Nazi Holocaust. It will be interesting to see how pacifist Oh Blah Blah responds to this mess. Estase figures the foreign policy of Hawaii Forty-Four will be that of MoveOn.org: do nothing and whine if it turns out badly.